أكبر مشكل يعانيه الفكر الإسلامي هو الخلط  بين دائرة تقديس المعرفي والعارف، فمثلا علم الحديث برمته ليس دينا كما زعم من قال بأن الاسناد من الدين، وأن علماء الحديث ليسوا مقدسيين، فنقد جهودكم ليس نقدا لثوابت الدين، ورد الحديث الشاذ سندا أو متنا ليس ردا على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم. وبالتالي فإن إغلاق باب نقد المعرفة والعارف ضخم من النزعة الصنمية، ووسع من دائرة التفسيرات الحرفية النقلية التي انتجت العقل الحشوي التجبيسي، الذي مارس فكرا تأثيميا، وفقها جنائريا؛ على من خالف مقدساته؛ من معارف وعارف !!

 فلسفة تطور العقل وتدرج الشرع

فهم فلسفة تطور العقل البشري في أطواره المتعددة

فهم مقاصد تدرج الوحي ،وعلّية أنزال الشرائع

 

إدراك العلاقة بين تدرج الوحي وتطور العقل

 

ولا ريب فإن قيم الوحي ودلالاتها الأخلاقية والقانونية في سنن الاجتماع البشري وسنن الكون مطلقة وليست نسبية

 

 

أما تدرج الوحي في أنزال الشرائع حسب تطور عقل الانسان وحاجاته لضبط علاقته بغيره من بنى الانسان ، ومعرفة قوانين استعمار الأرض

أول ما خلق الله العقل ،فقال له :أقبل فأقبل ، ثم قال له:أدبر فأدبر.ثم قال الله عز وجل :وعزتي وجلالي ما خلقت خلقا أكرم علي منك ، بك آخذ وبك أعطي وبك أثيب وبك أعاقب

 

ولا أخال أن تلك العقلية المقاصدية التي استطاعت التعامل من مقاصد الوحي بعقلية مقاصدية تراعي ظروف الزمان والمكان والانسان

 

FIQH OF TOLERANCE

This small paper is an attempt to highlight the right guidance in differing according to the theme and methodology of Ahlu Al-Sunnati wal Jamaa’ah. In addition, I made use of the series of the: Centre for Studies of Implementation of Shari’a Law in Islamabad where I have been the head of the department of research.

The fact, brothers, it is not unknown for you that Allah The All Praised and The All High, has ordered in the clear Revelation for unity, co-operation, and not to conflict nor dispute between us, as this may do away with our strength and make some of us taste punishment from others.  The All High said, “and do not dispute with each other that you may fail and your strength departs, and be patient.  Truly, Allah is with those who are patient.” (Surat Al’anfaal 8/46).

Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyiah, may Allah’s Mercy be upon him, said, “Such difference that has occurred in this Ummah including its scholars, Shaykhs, Ameers, and elites, is what brought the overpowering of enemies upon it.  This is due to their leaving action upon obedience of Allah and His messenger.  Whenever people leave some of what Allah ordered them to do, enmity and hatred befall them.  When people divide, then they become corrupt and perish, and when they gather, they are rectified and gain rule.  For the gathering is mercy, and division is torment.” 1/( 3:419 – 421).

This is an affirmation from the Shaykh, may Allah’s Mercy be upon him, that adhering to the congregation, and amicability is from the fundamentals of This Faith, therefore, the fundamental matter should not be diminished to preserve the lesser matter. Imam El-Tahawi confirmed this meaning in his book on “Aqeedah” or Islamic creed and considered it to be one of the fundamentals of Ahlu Sunnahti wal Jama’ah and said: “We follow the Sunnah and

the congregation (Jama’ah) and we avoid the odd, the dispute, and dividing” 2/ 208.

 We shall attempt in these few pages to clarify the matters of difference and their types, be they based upon major maters of difference or partial matters, or be they from matters of reasoned opinion, Ijtihad, or definite fundamentals.  We then discuss the manner of dealing with the one who is different, and guiding difference rightly according to the light of Islamic legislative rules.  They are as follows:

Types of difference:

Difference divides according to the mater disputed, into three types:

First type: Difference in branch matters and issues of Ijtihad.

Second type: Difference in fundamentals of faith and ways of belief.

Third type: Difference in political opinions and areas of activism.

 

The learnt Ibn Abi Al-Izz, the Hanafi, said: “Basically, the types of difference and deviations are two: difference of variation and difference of contradiction.” 2/289.

The difference of variation have further subdivisions, in some of which each one of the opinions or actions is truly a legislative right as the case of the Qiraãt (the different ways of recitation of the Holy Quran) upon which the companions (R) differed.  …and you find a difference among many people in this Ummah that lead some parties of them to fight on reading Iqamah once or twice! And this indeed in is the unlawful. 

As for the difference of contradiction, this is the two contradicting opinions, whether in fundamentals or subsidiary issues.” 2/289.

To obtain a copy please contact Al-Firdous Ltd,

10 Fonthill Road, London, N4 3HX.

www.al-firdous.co.uk

 

رجوع

 

مواقع علمية